PDA

View Full Version : Coach's Chalkboard


coachdent
11-17-2008, 05:16 PM
I saw some really good things from the offense that I really liked. Not sure if there is a mole in the organization that checks this board, but they did some things offensively that I have been calling for for weeks now. Having said that, they also reverted to some disturbing tendencies as well as soome questionable play calling decisions.

The Good
I thought Duane Brown played extremely well Sunday. Perhaps one of his best games. I know that may seem hard to imagine for some who saw the two sacks he gave up (more on that later). But the bottom line is, he went up against one of the premier defensive ends in the NFL and beat him repeatedly, overwhelmed him at orther times and more than held his own.

One of the keys to Brown's success was the Texans FINALLY giving him some help. They did so in a number of ways. Initially, the Texans ran zone plays the right repeatedly down the throats of the Colts. Just opened up the whoop *** and said here we come boys. A testament to the improvement and the excitement around Mr. Winston. Beautiful game on his part to be sure. They ran twice to the left in the first quarter where Brown was able to turn out Freeney to the outside and taking advantage of his overaggressive upfield rush.

Secondly, the Texans brought a tight end over to Brown's side on several occassions and actually CHIPPED Freeney on one play. I almost swallowed my pretzels! On three other occassions, the Texans employed a double tight end formation (including the Green touchdown plunge). On each of those sets, Brown went beserk destroying the Sam linebacker twice and driving a defensive tackle back four yards. As I said last week, this is where Brown excels. He excels inside and is better suited to play guard, covered up. When exposed, he has issues, but when he can just go after someone, he is a very good NFL lineman. He had an incredible backside scoop block where he went 2-for-1 cutting off a tackle and then being able to go up on a linebacker on one of the Slaton's big runs early on. An offensive line coach's dream!


The Bad
From a schmatic playcalling standpoint, there were several calls that irritated me byond belief. The first would be the fourth down call to run a sweep to Freeney's side with Kevin Walter and Andre Johnson squeezed in tight to the left. Hideous play that was destined for failure from the get-go. Kevin Walter leading? Ahman Green racing to the outside? AND it was into the boundry. A bevy of other options there much better than that crap.

Additionally, schematically, the Texans ran best when they ran downhill and attacked the Colt defense. The Indy defense is fast, but very small upfront and the Texans were controlling the line of scrimmage. To run a toss play against that defense is doing them a favor. The thing that they did not run...and have not run all year long is COUNTER! Counter is a no-brainer call against an overpersuing defense and tailor made for Indy. We didn't run counter once. Shame.

Next was the second sack that Duane Brown gave up. On that particular play, the Texans did ANOTHER thing that I have been screaming for, which is chipping the defensive end with a back. On the previous play, Slaton chipped Freeney and Brown easily handled Freeney with help to the outside. The next play, the Texans gave Brown help again with another chip block from Slaton. This time, the consummate pro Freeney, saw it coming and baited Brown upfield and spun underneath him. This is offensive line suicide. You NEVER give up the inside, ESPECIALLY when you have outside help. The whole point of chipping is so that you can be heavy on your inside protection and react late to the upfield rush. Poor job on that play from Brown not understanding his help on the protection.


The Ugly
Having said that the Texans used a back to chip Freeney and that they used some two tight end sets to him and they slammed released him with a tight end...what in God's name is Gary Kubiak thinking on 3rd down in the red zone and leaving Brown one on one with Freeney? Some fans probably blamed Brown for having Freeney blaze right by him and undoubtedly cursed the first rounder for sucking. But hey brother...they get paid to play too. If I have Dwight Freeney on my team and he is working against a rookie tackle and gets him in a one-on-one dead passing down, I am expecting him to make a play...and Freeney did. To leave the rookie out there by himself is akin to putting him on the spit to be roasted. In-san-ity. Forces a field goal when six was in the offering.

By somewhat popular demand form some, I will put up some comments on our defense, but if you look at how the Colts handled Mario Williams it was as if they had a plan. The Colts doubled him with a tackle and guard, slam released him with a tight end, blocked him with just a tight end with tackle help, doubled him with the tackle and tight end and chipped him with a back in addition to, at times, leaving him one on one. They ran away from him almost exclusively. They got burned on numerous occasions when he was singled up. But the key was with the Colts is that when they were singling up with Mario, Manning was either half rolling away from him or they were three step and one step passing. That's what you do to a premier pass rusher. The Texans took some significant steps forward in addressing issues in pass protection, but it has come too late in the season and does not come near the complexity that it needs to be at to combat dominant defensive ends.

Overall, offensively, I was pretty pleased with the offensive output in the game. Going into Indy and putting up 27 points should, on most occassions, get you a win. But as an offensive coach, I tell my team that we don't lose if we score every time. Learned that from Mike Leach at Texas Tech. Can't beat us if they don't stop us. The offense needed to be perfect and it wasn't. But strides were made.

SuperstarII
11-17-2008, 08:29 PM
The Bad
From a schmatic playcalling standpoint, there were several calls that irritated me byond belief. The first would be the fourth down call to run a sweep to Freeney's side with Kevin Walter and Andre Johnson squeezed in tight to the left. Hideous play that was destined for failure from the get-go. Kevin Walter leading? Ahman Green racing to the outside? AND it was into the boundry. A bevy of other options there much better than that crap.

Additionally, schematically, the Texans ran best when they ran downhill and attacked the Colt defense. The Indy defense is fast, but very small upfront and the Texans were controlling the line of scrimmage. To run a toss play against that defense is doing them a favor. The thing that they did not run...and have not run all year long is COUNTER! Counter is a no-brainer call against an overpersuing defense and tailor made for Indy. We didn't run counter once. Shame.

Next was the second sack that Duane Brown gave up. On that particular play, the Texans did ANOTHER thing that I have been screaming for, which is chipping the defensive end with a back. On the previous play, Slaton chipped Freeney and Brown easily handled Freeney with help to the outside. The next play, the Texans gave Brown help again with another chip block from Slaton. This time, the consummate pro Freeney, saw it coming and baited Brown upfield and spun underneath him. This is offensive line suicide. You NEVER give up the inside, ESPECIALLY when you have outside help. The whole point of chipping is so that you can be heavy on your inside protection and react late to the upfield rush. Poor job on that play from Brown not understanding his help on the protection.





I noticed that as well the terrible play calling and also the fact they keep on using repetitive plays as well. They need to seriously have two sets of plays which is one for the first half and one for the second half. They could of used more Nickel and Dime plays as well.

coachdent
11-18-2008, 11:59 AM
I noticed that as well the terrible play calling and also the fact they keep on using repetitive plays as well. They need to seriously have two sets of plays which is one for the first half and one for the second half. They could of used more Nickel and Dime plays as well. There is something to be said about doing what is successful. I liked the fact that the Texans pounded the right side of the defense mercilessly in the run game. Make them stop it. When the Colts didn't, they kept feeding the beast. The Colts did the same thing on offense running away from Mario. Shame on both coordinators for not coming up with solutions to combat very simplified attacks.

What the Texans need to do more of is running what are called "complimentary plays". These are plays that run off of another. The most common that everyone knows for the Texans is Bootleg. They run zone, zone, zone...and when the defenses shows that they are overpersuing, boom...hit them with the bootleg. The Texans missed some opportunities to run complimentary plays Sunday. Counter is a MUST run play in our system when you run zone. You have to run counter, otherwise there is nothing to keep those linebackers from scraping and overflowing. You can't only run boot as a solution... One guy (the DE) can shut down boot if he is disciplined and doesn't try to run down the zone play from behind every play. But when he continues to run upfield like Freeney was, you counter is tail. Pull the right guard and kick his *** out, send the tackle up for a linebacker and you are out the gate.

The Texans need to create more explosive plays in the run game. Counter is an explosive run play. Inside Zone is an explosive play. Outside and Middle Zone run plays, by definition are akin to the axiom: three yards and a cloud of dust.

Goatcheese
11-18-2008, 05:15 PM
The offense had some missteps, but overall played very well.

The problem was a defense that gave up over 30 points, again, and should have given up more if not for a bunch of Colts drops in the first half. These players combined with this coach is a recipe for terribad.

zanth91
11-18-2008, 05:55 PM
D Brown was absolutely blown up on one play, leading to a lightning quick sack.

caddy
11-18-2008, 07:09 PM
Good thing for the above... was feeling alone about seeing some good football at the Colts house. Yeah, we lost... but I saw us, play a good game.

coachdent
11-18-2008, 09:51 PM
D Brown was absolutely blown up on one play, leading to a lightning quick sack.I think I detailed that sack above. You want to take him out back and shoot him? Offensive tackles in the NFL sometimes get beat by All-Pro and potential Hall of Fame defensive ends. Happens.

Ever see the NFL films sequence with Bruce Matthews against the Redskins? Bruce got beat badly and gave up a sack. Awesome footage of the coaches getting into him and what his thought process was as he went to the bench.

Before you vilify Duane Brown, it might be prudent to exercise a tad bit of understanding in what happened and what is happening to the young man right now. Eric Winston was not a world beater in his first season. He is now a freakin' rock on the right side and is making very few mistakes. You sometimes have to get your nose bloodied a little bit with youngsters before they are to walk and run. He'll be fine and he'll be especially fine when and if they move him inside where he belongs.

Wolfscar
11-18-2008, 10:18 PM
Thankyou for the input coach - it's always good to see some positive comments on this board. I agree with you wholeheartedly on the explosive plays front. We have two explosive backs and a line that is really starting to work in unison, why not give Slaton or Green the opportunity to cut back and drop the overeager opposition on their a**es once in a while?

I do think our main problem is on D though. We handed away yet another game by allowing the Colts to march steadily down the field. Yes, sure, we're not giving up huge plays all the time like we used to but we're giving up 6-15 yard plays WAAAY too much. That's so much worse - particularly when you're not creating turnovers. If you can successfully goad and frustrate the opposition and then leap in and take the ball away or flatten the QB then it's okay to give some ground to achieve this, but when you don't create those big defensive plays - and don't look for a moment like you're going to - then this style of prevent defense lets the opposition control the field, rack up steady points, build their confidence and close your offense out of the game. It doesn't matter how effectively you run offense if they can't get on the field.

I know Kubiak and others are saying that it was largely the fault of poor technique, but when you're leaving opposing receivers - and runners - that wide open then there has to be something wrong schematically. Surely. If that's just sloppy execution of good schemes on the part of our defensive players then we need to clean them out entirely and get a whole new defensive roster.

TexSid
11-19-2008, 01:33 PM
Great analysis coach thanks for your insights. I like to O that game but the defense was poor which is too bad.

EyesWideOpen
11-19-2008, 02:54 PM
:mad:The offense needed to be perfect and it wasn't. But strides were made.:p

We do not need to be perfect. We do need points. Until our points scored matches our yards gained (#5 vs. #11) I am not ready to give our offense a thumbs up.

If our defense were not worshipping at the porcelain altar every week (allowing 17 passing tds, 3rd worst in the league and 15 rushing TDs, 4th worst in the league) then our #11 scoring offense would be praiseworthy. Currently, unless we want to become new version of the greatest show on turf we still have a long way to go. We are worst in the league, #32, allowing teams to score 93.1% of the time inside our 20 and almost 80% are touchdowns.

Not tough enough. Carthage must be destroyed (and Richard Smith must be given his walking papers).